South Dakota Voters to Decide on Recreational Marijuana Legalization
This November, South Dakota residents will once again have the opportunity to weigh in on the legalization of recreational marijuana. Initiated Measure 29, or IM-29, would allow individuals aged 21 and older to possess, grow, ingest, and distribute marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia.
Proponents of the measure argue that it is a “common-sense policy” that would generate revenue for the state through licensed businesses, rather than the black market, and allow law enforcement to focus on more serious crimes. They also claim that it would create new jobs and reduce incarceration expenses.
On the other hand, opponents of the measure are concerned about the potential risks to public health, particularly among teenagers, and the possibility of increased crime and impaired driving. They also argue that it would open the door to a range of negative consequences, including increased suicide rates and mental health problems.
If passed, IM-29 would add four new sections to Title 34 of the state’s codified laws, which covers public health and safety. It would allow individuals to possess up to 2 ounces of marijuana and grow up to six plants, with no more than 12 per household. However, it would still be illegal to drive under the influence, and there would be restrictions on where marijuana can be consumed, including schools, certain properties, and places of employment.
The measure would not decriminalize the sale of marijuana, but would decriminalize the sale of marijuana accessories. Additionally, it would not change the state’s medical marijuana program.
IM-29 sponsor Matthew Schweich, executive director of South Dakotans for Better Marijuana Law, argues that voting yes on the measure would protect personal freedom and restore the will of the people of South Dakota. He also supports strong labeling and packaging of marijuana products and THC caps.
However, opponents of the measure, including former state lawmaker Rhonda Milstead and Sioux Falls Mayor Paul TenHaken, argue that marijuana is not safe and would invite trouble into the state. They also claim that it would harm children, families, and communities.
Ultimately, the decision is up to South Dakota voters, who will have the opportunity to weigh in on IM-29 this November.
