Ohio Lawmakers Face Opposition Over Proposed Marijuana Law Changes
A heated debate erupted in the Ohio House Judiciary Committee as more than 20 individuals spoke out against a bill that seeks to alter the state’s marijuana law. Ohio House Bill 160, introduced by State Rep. Brian Stewart, R-Ashville, aims to reduce THC levels, cap the number of dispensaries, and reallocate tax revenue.
Opponents, including the ACLU of Ohio’s legislative director, Gary Daniels, argued that the bill would “kneecap” the current law and hinder the purchase, use, transportation, and sale of cannabis in the state. Daniels pointed out that Ohioans passed a citizen-initiated law to legalize recreational marijuana in 2023, and lawmakers can change the law since it passed as a citizen initiative.
The bill would also repeal the Cannabis Social Equity and Jobs Program, which was enacted through the passage of Issue 2. Opponents expressed concerns about the impact on the program and the state’s economy.
State Rep. Jamie Callender, R-Concord, defended the bill, stating that it represents a “thoughtful approach” and that the sponsor is open to finding common ground. Callender highlighted an example of an intoxicating hemp product he purchased, which he claimed had a higher THC level than some marijuana products.
Opponents, including the Marijuana Policy Project’s director of state policies, Karen O’Keefe, argued that the bill’s restrictions on cannabis do not resemble how alcohol is regulated. They questioned where Ohioans would be allowed to use marijuana if the bill passes.
The Ohio Senate has also introduced its own version of a bill, Senate Bill 56, which would overhaul the state’s marijuana law. The bill has yet to have a hearing in the House.
The debate highlights the ongoing controversy surrounding marijuana laws in Ohio and the ongoing efforts to regulate and restrict the industry.
